If there is a division as the observer and the observed, the observer creates a conflict between himself and the thing he is observing

If there is a division as the observer and the observed, the observer creates a conflict between himself and the thing he is observing. He modifies what he has observed and then tries to change what he has observed. He analyses what he has observed, and in the process of analysis, other problems are involved. So can the observer look without this division as the observer outside looking in? They are obviously one – the observer is the observed.